What is the difference between apogee duet and duet 2

The physical inputs and outputs are sparse. On the rear, you can find the power port, the USB 2. On the breakout cable, you can find two analog combo inputs and two balanced line-level outputs. In terms of performance, Apogee Duet 2 is really impressive. It offers astonishing width, depth, and detail on the sounds.

The mic preamps are also exemplary, and definitely very viable for serious recording projects. However, there is a minor quirk; if you use high input gains, you may here slight zipper noise when adjusting the gain levels. With the instrument-level input, you can get 65dB of gain, which is really good.

With the line-level input, the gain option is removed completely. The USB connection actually has a very low latency. You can perform software monitoring without any significant delay. However, the inclusion of a power port can be useful when high current draw is needed; for example, when you need to switch on the phantom power for condenser mics while working with high-impedance headphones.

Apogee Duet 2 also has a built-in power management system which automatically lowers the headphone level to ensure optimum phantom power performance in the case of excessive current draw. This is definitely useful, but you should just use the power port instead of relying on the bus power when working with phantom power.

In general, Apogee Duet 2 is more recommended. It has two input channels, so it can be more versatile. It supports sample rates of up to kHz, and the overall performance is much better.

The sound has better width, depth, and detail. The mic preamps also have better gain levels. Apogee Duet 2 can be bus-powered, but a power port is available when high current draw is needed.

Your email address will not be published. Even at 16 simultaneous tracks at 24 bit your not going to have any noticeable difference between FW and USB2. The issue is having other devices running on the same bus. If you plug in a usb harddrive, a usb stick and a usb interface, the data stream in the USB bus is much more likely to break up the audio stream from the interface with chunks of data from other places.

The great thing about firewire is that it prioritises longer streams of audio data without them being broken up by other sources. That's why people choose firewire over usb, not the raw data rate.

I actually rarely use firewire stuff because USB is perfectly adequate, much more widely adopted and generally cheaper. If you commit to buying a firewire interface, then it's way less likely that you can just turn up anywhere with it and plug it straight into any machine you find, but you could almost guarantee it with a USB one.

I will change my position from there being no difference "none", to no appreciable difference, "none". I see people getting all hung up on Firewire versus USB 2 and it's so negligible and there are so many other things that actually do have an effect on recording that it just adds unnecessary noise to the decision on what equipment to get.

There may be a few special circumstances where it would make a difference, but I can't see it having any effect on a newb getting their first system other than making it more confusing.

So to stomp that fire out I say there is no difference. Messages Dear friends, I have a good deal for a apogee duet 1 and also for a duet 2. Which one should I take? Are the preamps that diferent? Need to decide it until tomorrow Any help is well appreciated!! You probably want the 2. I'm wondering if the drivers work for the Duet 1? And if so, for how long? Don't know if there are physical differences between them, but seems risky to get the older model with regard to compatibility.

Messages 1, I had them. Moderators: Corey W , Rim. Post by JoeyOz » Fri Jan 03, am. Post by Phil » Fri Jan 03, pm. Post by Airyck » Fri Jan 03, pm. Post by opoteat » Sun Mar 02, am. Post by dominicperry » Sun Mar 02, am.